Category: nbmgvejz

House for Kika and Xisco / Duch Pizá Architects

first_imgSave this picture!© Jaime Sicilia+ 13 Share ShareFacebookTwitterPinterestWhatsappMailOrhttps://www.archdaily.com/264573/house-for-kika-and-xisco-duch-piza-architects Clipboard Projects Photographs:  Jaime Sicilia Text description provided by the architects. We built the house at an angle of the plot, so the garden occupies the western side, the front and connects with a small courtyard garden, located on the east side.Save this picture!© Jaime SiciliaRecommended ProductsSide tablesBoConceptLos Angeles Lounge Table 6230ChairsB&B ItaliaArmchair – JensCultural / PatrimonialIsland Exterior FabricatorsSeptember 11th Memorial Museum Envelope SystemThe program, for a family with five children, requires the maximal optimization, with places to share and places for the isolation. This effort is visible in the sections: the fixed banks are also skylights that allow the light pass through and get to the basement (one of the best places in the house), the staircase becomes a big library, bedrooms communicate with sliding doors so that five bedrooms are grouped into two galleries. Holes in roofs and floors let natural light get inside the house.Save this picture!© Jaime SiciliaMaterials spread out with unusual rules: the zinc of the roof forms the staircase facade and the brick covers the floor as well as walls. The wood, handcrafted, is used for carpentry, flooring, furniture, giving a warm tone to the interior light. The green of the cypress gets the rest.Save this picture!SectionProject gallerySee allShow lessDT House / Jorge Graca CostaSelected ProjectsSisli Halide Edip Adivar Mosque and Social Complex Winning Proposal / Kolektif MimarlarArticles Share Architects: Duch Pizá Architects Year Completion year of this architecture project 2007 “COPY” “COPY” ArchDaily CopyHouses•Palma, Spaincenter_img Spain Year:  Photographs House for Kika and Xisco / Duch Pizá Architects House for Kika and Xisco / Duch Pizá ArchitectsSave this projectSaveHouse for Kika and Xisco / Duch Pizá Architects Houses ShareFacebookTwitterPinterestWhatsappMailOrhttps://www.archdaily.com/264573/house-for-kika-and-xisco-duch-piza-architects Clipboard CopyAbout this officeDuch Pizá ArchitectsOfficeFollowProductsWoodSteelBrick#TagsProjectsBuilt ProjectsSelected ProjectsResidential ArchitectureHousesWoodHousesPalmaSpainPublished on August 23, 2012Cite: “House for Kika and Xisco / Duch Pizá Architects” 23 Aug 2012. ArchDaily. Accessed 11 Jun 2021. ISSN 0719-8884Read commentsBrowse the CatalogSinkshansgroheBathroom Mixers – Metropol ClassicVinyl Walls3MVinyl Finish- DI-NOC™ Glass FinishPartitionsSkyfoldWhere to Increase Flexibility in SchoolsMetal PanelsDri-DesignMetal Panels – Painted AluminumStonesCosentinoDekton® Surfaces – Chicago 444Exterior DeckingLunawoodThermowood DeckingWoodBruagAcoustic Panels with LEDWindowsOTTOSTUMM | MOGSWindow Systems – CPXPanels / Prefabricated AssembliesULMA Architectural SolutionsHexapent Facade PanelDoorsRabel Aluminium SystemsMinimal Folding Door System – Rabel 3710 Super ThermalWall / Ceiling LightsLuminisCeiling Surface Lights – HollowcoreBenches / TablesUrbaStyleConcrete Bench – BoomerangMore products »Read commentsSave世界上最受欢迎的建筑网站现已推出你的母语版本!想浏览ArchDaily中国吗?是否翻译成中文现有为你所在地区特制的网站?想浏览ArchDaily中国吗?Take me there »✖You’ve started following your first account!Did you know?You’ll now receive updates based on what you follow! Personalize your stream and start following your favorite authors, offices and users.Go to my streamlast_img read more

CAF’s Allaboutgiving site shut down by surge to donate

first_img About Howard Lake Howard Lake is a digital fundraising entrepreneur. Publisher of UK Fundraising, the world’s first web resource for professional fundraisers, since 1994. Trainer and consultant in digital fundraising. Founder of Fundraising Camp and co-founder of GoodJobs.org.uk. Researching massive growth in giving. CAF then suggest alternative methods of making donations – online using a credit or debit card via givenow.org, directly to the Disasters Emergency Committee at dec.org.uk, or by cheque or CAF charity account cheque through the post. CAF’s Allaboutgiving site shut down by surge to donate AddThis Sharing ButtonsShare to TwitterTwitterShare to FacebookFacebookShare to LinkedInLinkedInShare to EmailEmailShare to WhatsAppWhatsAppShare to MessengerMessengerShare to MoreAddThis Tagged with: Consulting & Agencies Digital Research / statisticscenter_img  52 total views,  2 views today AddThis Sharing ButtonsShare to TwitterTwitterShare to FacebookFacebookShare to LinkedInLinkedInShare to EmailEmailShare to WhatsAppWhatsAppShare to MessengerMessengerShare to MoreAddThis Charities Aid Foundation has had temporarily to shut down its allaboutgiving.org site due to the volume of people trying to access it to donate to charities involved in responding to the South Asian floods disaster.A notice on the front page of the site which promotes tax-efficient giving to charity states:“The public’s unprecedented response to the Disaster Appeal for South East Asia has led to access difficulties for many people wishing to donate online. We have had to temporarily shut down this particular site. Your donations are critical – please bear with us.” Advertisement Howard Lake | 31 December 2004 | Newslast_img read more

JustGiving and HMRC in agreement over restoring lost Gift Aid on ‘family donations’

first_img Howard Lake | 16 March 2016 | News  270 total views,  2 views today AddThis Sharing ButtonsShare to TwitterTwitterShare to FacebookFacebookShare to LinkedInLinkedInShare to EmailEmailShare to WhatsAppWhatsAppShare to MessengerMessengerShare to MoreAddThis65 About Howard Lake Howard Lake is a digital fundraising entrepreneur. Publisher of UK Fundraising, the world’s first web resource for professional fundraisers, since 1994. Trainer and consultant in digital fundraising. Founder of Fundraising Camp and co-founder of GoodJobs.org.uk. Researching massive growth in giving. AddThis Sharing ButtonsShare to TwitterTwitterShare to FacebookFacebookShare to LinkedInLinkedInShare to EmailEmailShare to WhatsAppWhatsAppShare to MessengerMessengerShare to MoreAddThis65 JustGiving and HMRC in agreement over restoring lost Gift Aid on ‘family donations’center_img Tagged with: Digital Gift Aid HMRC Justgiving Law / policy ResolutionJustGiving has worked with HMRC over 15 years, since it first started handling online Gift Aid declarations. HMRC assured it that the crackdown was not limited to online donations or sites that promoted ‘social giving’, but was part of a sector-wide attempt to improve the way Gift Aid was applied.Fortunately, JustGiving and HMRC have now reached an agreement that will result in many of these previously rejected Gift Aid declarations being accepted. JustGiving was able to present HMRC with feedback from donors and charities on why people chose to mention more than one name in their comments.Up to four names of linked family members acceptedA temporary lifting of the family name restriction has now been agreed. This means that JustGiving will now be able to claim Gift Aid on donations that feature comments from up to four names of linked family members.Even better, HRMC is permitting JustGiving to claim Gift Aid retrospectively on all donations from November 2015 to now that comply with this new definition.JustGiving describe this retrospective processing to be “challenging”. It is advising charities to expect the payments to be phased in over several weeks. Any successful retrospective transactions will be flagged up in JustGiving’s reporting to charities.At present it is still working on a clear process, and once it does, charities affected will be notified.In a blog post on the subject, JustGiving’s Head of Partnerships Katherine Scott-Barrett wrote:“Our ambition has always been to ensure that every UK taxpayer entitled to claim Gift Aid on their charitable donation is able to do so, and we will continue to work closely with HMRC to ensure that Gift Aid is applied accurately and fairly, while making the experience as intuitive as possible for donors”.  269 total views,  1 views today Online giving site JustGiving has reached an agreement with HMRC that will see thousands of charities regain Gift Aid income that had been rejected by HMRC because it appeared to come from more than one family member.JustGiving, along with other charities, experienced a sudden rise in rejections of Gift Aid submissions to HMRC towards the end of 2015, the result of more stringent application of regulations. Evidence of ‘family donations’ or ‘social giving’ was taken to indicate that the donation was not made out of taxed paid by one individual, and so did not qualify for Gift Aid.Multiple names triggered Gift Aid rejectionsJustGiving’s site, which encourages donors to leave public messages of support, was found to contain messages such as “with love from Mum and Dad’. These could be taken to indicate that the donation was made jointly and not by an individual tax-payer and therefore would not qualify under Gift Aid. Similarly, posting two names in the message box sender field was interpreted in the same way.Indeed, the giving service was instructed to apply this stricter definition retrospectively, with the result that the Gift Aid element on earlier donations was cancelled, resulting in charities finding that their anticipated income had suddenly dropped.The Daily Mail’s Money section today cites examples of donors who found that their Gift Aid declaration had been removed retrospectively in Shameless HMRC grabbing thousands in charity cash: Why writing ‘love mum and dad’ on donations lets taxman pocket a fat slice.It quotes one donor who donated £300 at Christmas to a hospice that had cared for his son who found his £75 Gift Aid payment had disappeared from the giving page. He said:“Of course I’m going to write my wife’s name on a message to our son. We are his mum and dad. But that shouldn’t mean my donation isn’t eligible for Gift Aid — I was donating my money from my bank account that I’d earned and paid tax on.” Advertisementlast_img read more

The Hidden Agenda Behind The Animal Care Movement

first_img Facebook Twitter Following a allegations by Mercy for Animals, a front group for HSUS, an independent veterinarian, who was taken by law enforcement to the Pipestone Farm facility shown in the video, determined that there were no signs of inhumane treatment or violations of good production standards. Therefore, no charges were filed. The farm did not stop there. They brought in a third party to investigate. The farm’s investigation determined that the employee involved had not been following animal care protocols, and he was immediately fired. Facebook Twitter By Gary Truitt SHARE Ironically, just a few days after this panel discussion, another undercover video alleging animal mistreatment made the news.  It is getting to be so commonplace that that national news media hardly covers it anymore. The video purported to show mistreatment of hogs on a Minnesota farm. While local media coverage was significant and over-dramatic, very little national coverage occurred. Only the Huffington Post — and I only marginally consider them a news source — picked up the story. There was also something different about this case, the farmer fought back. The Hidden Agenda Behind The Animal Care Movement Home Commentary The Hidden Agenda Behind The Animal Care Movement While the farm had done nothing wrong, its image and reputation have been damaged. But this is perfectly acceptable to groups like HSUS and HEC. During the panel discussion, the HEC attorney said that, even if farmers were not doing anything illegally, they still should be subject to unauthorized public inspection and exposure. Ms. Ferraro stated that, if legal and industry acceptable practices of a farm offended the sensibilities of the public, they should be exposed with undercover investigations. The real agenda behind the animal activist movement is the total domination and, in some cases, elimination of animal agriculture.  These groups are also prepared to fight farmers who try and defend themselves and their industry from these attacks. The anti-videotaping legislation being proposed across the country is an example of this. Farmers are tired of being victims and are not just reacting but being proactive in the fight against those who are committed more to an anti-meat agenda than animal care. This agenda is not limited to the livestock sector, row crop farmers are beginning to face the same battle from biotech and environmental activists.  By Gary Truitt – Nov 3, 2013 Previous articleRecruiting Pork Producers of Tomorrow at National FFA ConventionNext articleCLA Says Report Shows Need to Fix Pesticide Regulatory Process Gary Truitt A few weeks ago I had the opportunity to participate in a panel discussion hosted by FarmWorld. The topic was legislation that prevents the videotaping and photographing of farming operations without the farmer’s knowledge or permission.  Also on the panel were representatives of the print media, Indiana Farm Bureau, and Kim E. Ferraro, Staff Attorney and Director of Agricultural and Water Policy with the Hoosier Environmental Council. While the discussion was spirited, for the most part it traversed some well-traveled ground on this issue, much of which I have written about in previous columns. There were, however, some interesting insights gleaned from the statements made by HEC that provide a glimpse into the agenda behind its animal care facade. SHARE This is just the tip of the iceberg when it comes to uncovering the agenda behind the animal activist movement. Later in the panel discussion, HEC attacked Farm Bureau on their support of laws that protect farmers from frivolous lawsuits. The National Pork Producers Council asserts that the Pipestone case came in response to HSUS losing a court battle with NPPC over the pork logo, ” HSUS has spent significant amounts of its donors’ money on futile legislative efforts and on a lawsuit that had nothing to do with animal welfare which was dismissed by a U.S. District Court judge.”last_img read more

USDA Still Has Over $2 Billion to Invest in Rural America

first_img Facebook Twitter SHARE The U.S. Department of Agriculture has more than $2 billion available this year to invest in community facilities and infrastructure projects in rural areas. “Modern and accessible education, health care, public safety, and municipal services are the foundation for a high quality of life,” says Acting Assistant to the Secretary for Rural Development Joel Baxley. “The USDA is committed to be a strong partner for rural communities to build the facilities they need for their essential services, as well as improve the infrastructure those services rely on to operate in rural America.” USDA is already making those kinds of investments in rural communities across the country and has additional funding available through the Community Facilities Direct Loan Program.More than 100 types of projects are eligible for funding under the USDA’s Community Facilities Program. Eligible applicants include municipalities, public bodies, nonprofit organizations, and federally-recognized Native American tribes. Congress appropriated $2.8 billion for the Community Facilities direct loans and grants in the fiscal year 2019. USDA Still Has Over $2 Billion to Invest in Rural America Facebook Twitter By NAFB News Service – Jun 25, 2019 Home Indiana Agriculture News USDA Still Has Over $2 Billion to Invest in Rural America SHARE Previous articleCrouch Flies Drones and Talks Ag Tech at Purdue on TuesdayNext articleMember Legislative Outreach is Indiana Farm Bureau Priority NAFB News Servicelast_img read more

Judicial harassment of war crimes reporter continues

first_img June 2, 2021 Find out more Organisation to go further January 15, 2009 – Updated on January 20, 2016 Judicial harassment of war crimes reporter continues Receive email alerts Use the Digital Services Act to make democracy prevail over platform interests, RSF tells EU December 2, 2020 Find out more Ten RSF recommendations for the European Union Follow the news on Croatia Help by sharing this information RSF and 60 other organisations call for an EU anti-SLAPP directive center_img RSF_en News News Reporters Without Borders condemns the charge that was brought yesterday at the behest at interior minister Tomislav Karamarko against a journalist who writes about war crimes in the 1990s. Zeljko Peratovic is accused of “disseminating information likely to upset the population” under article 322/1 KZA of the criminal code, which carries a maximum sentence of a year in prison as well as a possible fine.In blog entries (peratovic.net and peratovic.blog.hr), letters to national judicial officials and a series of public statements, Peratovic has accused the interior minister of obstructing the investigation into the death of Milan Levar, a witness under the protection of the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY), who was killed by a car bomb in the southeastern village of Gospic in August 2000.Peratovic was questioned as a witness in the course of the investigation because he was one of the last people to see Levar alive. The prosecutor in charge of the investigation subsequently identified Peratovic as a witness, in violation of judicial confidentiality.“Interior minister Karamarko portrays himself as the victim of defamation and claims that I want to upset the population, but he is pursuing a different objective” Peratovic said. “As well as fining me, the court could above all decide to ban me from disseminating information for an indefinite period. That would prevent be from undertaking any kind of journalistic activity, on my blog or in other media.”Peratovic added: “It would also prevent me from continuing my effort to discover who was behind Milan Levar’s murder. Some people are counting on the statute of limitations eventually applying to this case. Silencing me could be a way of achieving this.”Reporters Without Borders said: “It seems that press investigations into war crimes are not welcome at a time when Croatia is trying to join the European Union. The interior minister should be trying to help the investigation into a protected witness’s murder rather than attacking those who refuse to let war crimes be forgotten and go unpunished.”“The prosecution being brought against Peratovic under article 322/1 is ridiculous and unacceptable,” the press freedom organisation continued. “The crime of ‘information likely to upset the population’ reflects on obsolete view of freedom of expression that is incompatible with the European democratic standards that Croatia will have to conform to if it wants to join the EU.”Reporters Without Borders added: “If the prosecution of Peratovic goes ahead, we insist that whenever any of the parties are questioned in court, it no longer takes place behind closed doors.”Zeljko Peratovic, who received death threats in 2008 in the form of comments added to his blog, was arrested at his home on 17 October 2007 on a charge of revealing state secret for posting documents on his blog relating to war crimes in Gospic in the 1990s, and for referring to the existence of a video of witness accusing former defence minister Gojko Susak (now deceased) and a parliamentary deputy president of involvement. Aged 42, he faced a possible three-year prison sentence. In the event, the prosecution was not pursued but the charges have not been withdrawn and the files confiscated by the police have still not been returned to him.Peratovic has worked for various newspapers, the latest of which is Vjesnik. His investigations into war crimes have earned him a lot of trouble. He has been fired, he has been physically attacked and he is regarded as a traitor by many of his compatriots, who refuse outright to consider the possibility that Croatians may have committed war crimes.He received the received the press freedom prize of the Reporters Without Borders Austrian section in 2003. CroatiaEurope – Central Asia CroatiaEurope – Central Asia News News November 23, 2020 Find out morelast_img read more

Derry City Council and Foyle Search and Rescue reach agreement on One Big Weekend…

first_img Derry City Council and Foyle Search and Rescue reach agreement on One Big Weekend cover Man arrested on suspicion of drugs and criminal property offences in Derry WhatsApp Facebook Facebook Previous articleUpdate: Sinn Fein demands release of Donegal man charged with detonating 1982 Hyde Park bombNext articleUlster Championship Preview – Tyrone News Highland By News Highland – May 22, 2013 Further drop in people receiving PUP in Donegal Pinterest Google+ RELATED ARTICLESMORE FROM AUTHOR Pinterestcenter_img 75 positive cases of Covid confirmed in North Twitter Google+ News 365 additional cases of Covid-19 in Republic Main Evening News, Sport and Obituaries Tuesday May 25th Derry City Council has moved to ease concerns over the resources available for the Foyle Search and Rescue Team to cover the One Big Weekend in Derry.Craig Smith, chairman of the Foyle Search and Rescue team said the organisation was having trouble getting funding for two extra rescue boats and two jet skis to compliment their usual patrols.The last time the One Big Weekend was held in the city, Foyle Search and Rescue had four boats on the river with 24 people rescued from the water in a single day.To cover this years events, which 40,000 people are to attend,  Derry City Council initially offered funding for just one boat and one jetski.A meeting took place between representatives of Derry council and Foyle Search and Rescue on Tuesday to discuss the issue.Today a spokesperson for Derry City Council confirmed that contractual arrangements with Foyle Search and Rescue have been agreed and finalised for the Radio 1, One Big Weekend concerts, in accordance with best practice and strict health and safety guidelines. WhatsApp Gardai continue to investigate Kilmacrennan fire Twitterlast_img read more

NYC cracks down on selling of illegal fireworks as complaints skyrocket

first_imgphotovs/iStockBy AARON KATERSKY and EMILY SHAPIRO, ABC News(NEW YORK) — As complaints of illegal fireworks skyrocket in New York City, the mayor says he’s establishing a task force to crack down on sales.For the first half of June, fireworks complaints soared to 1,737 — compared to 21 complaints for the same period last year.The task force — made up of 10 NYPD officers, 12 FDNY fire marshals and 20 members of the Sheriff’s Bureau of Criminal Investigation — will target those supplying, distributing and possessing large amounts of illegal fireworks, the mayor’s office said.“We’re cracking down on this activity at the source to ensure the safety of all New Yorkers and the ability of our neighbors to get some sleep,” Mayor Bill de Blasio said in a statement.The NYPD on Tuesday said it was searching for the man who threw a lit firework on a sleeping homeless person early Monday.The firework exploded and the victim suffered burns to his back.The mayor on Tuesday also announced new plans for this year’s Macy’s 4th of July fireworks.Instead of one big fireworks show on July 4, New York City and Macy’s will provide a series of shows on different nights that are five minutes each to promote social distancing.De Blasio said the displays will be brought to all five boroughs with shows starting on June 29.The finale will be on July 4 from the top of the Empire State Building, he said.New York City, the epicenter of the coronavirus pandemic, entered phase two of reopening on Monday, with hair salons and barber shops opening their doors, as well as restaurants for outdoor dining. Copyright © 2020, ABC Audio. All rights reserved.last_img read more

Bodycam footage suggests Jonathan Price shooting was unwarranted, affidavit says

first_imgKali9/iStockBy IVAN PEREIRA, MARC NATHANSON, and JAMES SCHOLZ, ABC News(WOLFE CITY, Texas) — The entire interaction between Texas police officer Shaun Lucas and the 31-year-old Black man he shot and killed Saturday was captured in police body camera footage, according to the arrest affidavit released by investigators Wednesday.Lucas, who is white, is facing murder charges following the incident at a gas station in Wolfe City. The investigation is being handled by the Texas Rangers.Lucas, 22, responded to a domestic dispute call at the gas station’s convenience store around 8:24 p.m. Saturday, according to the affidavit. Price’s family says Price was attempting to break up the dispute and didn’t threaten anyone.Based on the bodycam footage, which has not been released to the public, the affidavit says that when Lucas arrived at the scene, Price greeted him and came “very close to Officer Lucas, asking ‘You doing good?’ multiple times while extending his hand in a handshake gesture.”“Price apologized for broken glass on the ground and stated someone had tried to ‘wrap me up,’” the affidavit said.Lucas told investigators that he thought that Price was intoxicated and attempted to detain Price, but Price allegedly stated, “I can’t be detained,” the affidavit said.The officer then tried to detain Price “by grabbing his arm and using verbal commands,” but was unsuccessful, the affidavit said. He then produced his Taser, according to the affidavit.Lucas warned Price to comply or he would use his Taser, and when Price walked away, the officer fired the Taser, the affidavit said.While being tased, Price walked toward Lucas and tried to reach for the weapon, at which point the officer took out his service weapon and fired four times, according to the affidavit.Price died later that night at the hospital.The affidavit concluded that the officer “did then and there intentionally and knowingly cause the death of Price by discharging a firearm.”Lucas was arrested Monday night on murder charges and held on $1 million bond.A statement released Monday by the Texas Rangers said that “The preliminary investigation indicates that the actions of Officer Lucas were not objectionably reasonable.”On Tuesday, Lucas retained attorney Robert Rogers, who defended Dallas police officer Amber Guyger against similar charges last year.Guyger was convicted of murder after she accidentally entered the apartment of her upstairs neighbor, Botham Jean, and fatally shot him when she mistook him for an intruder, on Sept. 6, 2018. Rogers argued that Guyger perceived Jean as a deadly threat and thus committed no crime.In a statement on Saturday’s shooting, Rogers said, “Officer Lucas only discharged his weapon in accordance with Texas law when he was confronted with an aggressive assailant who was attempting to take his Taser.”“It’s just — this is just — I can’t wrap my brain around this,” Lucas’ stepfather told Dallas ABC affiliate WFAA Tuesday. “He’s a good kid. He’s devastated. He’s devastated for everybody involved.”The Hunt County District Attorney’s office said Tuesday that the investigation into the incident is continuing.Copyright © 2020, ABC Audio. All rights reserved.last_img read more

New paper looks at sexual harassment of flight crews

first_imgIn the latest paper from the Harvard Chan Sustainability and Health Initiative for Netpositive Enterprise (SHINE) program titled “Work, Gender, and Sexual Harassment on the Frontlines of Commercial Travel: A Cross-Sectional Study of Flight Crew Well-Being,” researchers examined the scale and scope of experience of sexual harassment at work among male and female flight attendants.The paper was published in The International Journal of Aerospace Psychology and lead by researchers Dorota Weziak-Białowolska, Piotr Białowolski, Irina Mordukhovich, and Eileen McNeely.The data the research team examined represented the perception and prevalence of sexual harassment related to a hostile work environment among 8,700 North American (U.S. and Canada) and 1,887 United Kingdom (U.K.) flight attendants in the Harvard Flight Attendant Health Study.The study team found that 26 percent of North American flight attendants and 11 percent of U.K. flight attendants reported sexual harassment, mostly from passengers, pilots, and coworkers. Furthermore, 61 percent of U.K. flight attendants experienced unwanted sexual behaviors, pointing to possible under-reporting of the sexual harassment problem. Sexually offensive behaviors received variable labeling as sexual harassment depending on gender of the victim and perpetrator profile.Sexual harassment is a potentially under-reported workplace problem for flight attendants with under-reporting resulting from gender-specific differences in individual perceptions. Understanding these differences is vital to addressing sexual harassment and the concomitant health risks. The study team’s results provide new information to guide future research regarding well-being of this understudied group of service employees.Despite public attention, sexual harassment still lacks sufficient scientific scrutiny of its context and cost. This paper sheds light on the prevalence and sources of sexual harassment relating it to gender, as well as cultural norms for acceptable behavior. This study evaluates these perceptions within a feminized workforce of flight attendants that is driven by customer service — a context likely to complicate power relationships and exposure to sexual harassment perplexed by the majority and minority gender views. Read Full Storylast_img read more